Skip to content
Thursday 17 September 2026 marketing · daily

Campaigns · Abhik Sanyal

DSP Bets on Search Intent Over Returns Hype in New Campaign

DSP Mutual Fund split its Multi Asset campaign by investor intent, using AI to sort 100+ search queries. Marketing head Abhik Sanyal on data deluge and measurement.

DSP splits its campaign by search intent, not demographics
In this story
  1. Two mindsets, two message tracks
  2. ‘We drown in dashboards’
  3. Why marketers outside BFSI should care

DSP Mutual Fund has taken an unusual route with its latest digital campaign for Multi Asset Allocation Funds: instead of chasing the category’s hot streak, it is asking investors to slow down and understand what these funds are actually built to do.

The trigger was a mismatch. Interest in the category has exploded, but the questions investors bring to it often have little to do with why the product exists. According to AMFI data cited by the fund house, Multi Asset Allocation Funds pulled 27% of net inflows into equity-oriented schemes in the January-March 2026 quarter, up from 21% the previous quarter and just 6% a year earlier. At DSP itself, the number of investors transacting in the category has tripled year on year.

Two mindsets, two message tracks

To figure out how people research the category, DSP studied more than 100 investor search queries and found two broad clusters.

  • Return Seekers — searching on performance, rankings and whether the category is “worth investing in” right now.
  • Diversifiers — searching on portfolio construction, asset allocation and how the category behaves across market cycles.

Rather than funnel both groups into one creative message, the campaign routes each to dedicated content matched to search intent. Return-focused searchers get an explainer on the role and realistic expectations of the category; diversification-focused searchers get content on how multiple asset classes work together to build resilience. Artificial intelligence was used to analyse the search behaviour and organise queries at scale.

Media is deliberately spread across the research journey — search, display in metros and the top 20 cities, social and audio, including Google, Meta, LinkedIn, X, Spotify, RED FM, Reddit, Tickertape and CRED.

‘We drown in dashboards’

Speaking to MediaNews4U, Abhik Sanyal, Head of Marketing at DSP Asset Managers, said the real problem with digital is not scarcity of data but excess of it — marketers, in his words, “drown in dashboards and starve for the one thing that matters,” which is whether the marketing actually caused an outcome that would not have happened anyway.

His measurement wishlist is a useful checklist for any performance marketer:

  • A genuine cross-media measurement currency so TV, OTT and digital can be read on one page.
  • A shift from last-click attribution to incrementality and lift testing, because much of what is celebrated as performance is people who would have converted regardless.
  • Clean-room measurement to connect exposure to outcome as third-party identifiers fade.

For his category, though, the metrics that matter are behavioural: was a SIP started, was it held through a fall, and was it still running five years later.

Why marketers outside BFSI should care

Three transferable lessons stand out.

Intent segmentation beats demographic segmentation. DSP did not split audiences by age or city first; it split them by the question they were asking. Search queries are the cheapest, most honest audience research available, and most brands still leave them to the SEO team alone.

Point AI at reflection, not speed. Sanyal argues the interesting use of AI is to slow down important decisions — showing someone their own history at the moment they are about to repeat a mistake — rather than to make transactions frictionless. In a category where a panicked redemption is a lost customer, friction is a feature.

Deliberately under-promise when the product is volatile. DSP’s earlier work — a small-cap campaign built on “pause and think” and a print-plus-digital campaign titled “We don’t know what happens next” — leaned on honesty about discomfort rather than urgency. His reasoning is blunt: the investor won with urgency is the one who exits at the first fall, and urgency may flatter one quarter while damaging persistence the next year.

That is the broader takeaway for marketers of any considered-purchase product. Acquisition is not the finish line. If churn, cancellation or early exit is the real cost centre, the campaign’s job is expectation-setting, not excitement.

Source: MediaNews4U

Written by

Marketing Junkies Desk

Marketing Junkies covers agency moves, campaigns, martech and adtech launches with an Indian and global lens. Every story is written from a named source and links back to it.